Advertisement
I’m looking for people interested in Tibetan-yoga.
I am trying to see if there is enough interest to start a –private- mailing-list where it would be possible to discuss the topic in more depth than is possible in a public forum. Strictly speaking it would not be limited to just Tibetan practice, and dialogue about Indian, Newar, and Central-Asian variants would be encouraged.
I would also welcome discussion of how these methods relate to better-known methods like Hatha-yoga and Kundalini practices.
Please contact me if you would be interested in such a mailing-list.
Warm Regards,
Ryan
Subjects of interest would include:
Tummo (candali): The yoga of inner-fire. The Buddhist equivalent of kundalini-yoga
Trul-khor (yantra): A sophisticated methodology similar to Hatha-yoga
Tsa-lung (nadi-vayu) Employing the prana and energy-channels of the body
Kumnye (abhyanga-mardana): Application of ointments and massage
Lojung: Body-training in the broad sense (including yoga)
I am trying to see if there is enough interest to start a –private- mailing-list where it would be possible to discuss the topic in more depth than is possible in a public forum. Strictly speaking it would not be limited to just Tibetan practice, and dialogue about Indian, Newar, and Central-Asian variants would be encouraged.
I would also welcome discussion of how these methods relate to better-known methods like Hatha-yoga and Kundalini practices.
Please contact me if you would be interested in such a mailing-list.
Warm Regards,
Ryan
Subjects of interest would include:
Tummo (candali): The yoga of inner-fire. The Buddhist equivalent of kundalini-yoga
Trul-khor (yantra): A sophisticated methodology similar to Hatha-yoga
Tsa-lung (nadi-vayu) Employing the prana and energy-channels of the body
Kumnye (abhyanga-mardana): Application of ointments and massage
Lojung: Body-training in the broad sense (including yoga)
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Thu, August 28, 2008 - 8:03 PMRyan, I would be interested in this private mailing list. Thanks.
-
Unsu...
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Thu, August 28, 2008 - 9:35 PMI most certainly would -
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Sun, August 31, 2008 - 3:35 PMHi Ryan, yes I´m definitely interested in these subjects. Have studied and come accross some of the subjects you mention but never had a chance to deepen knowledge (yet experience) in these. Hopefully some knowledgable person may join the message list, too.
Cheers.
-
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Tue, September 2, 2008 - 12:05 AMInterested!
Have you considered using Yahoo groups? Or perhaps create a tribe especially for the purpose! -
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Tue, September 2, 2008 - 9:28 AMThere appears to be enough interest to merit starting a mailing list. You can sign up at the link below.
groups.yahoo.com/group/Tibetan-Yoga/
Generally speaking, to join you will need to be a practitioner of some form of Tibetan yoga.
However, exceptions to this rule may be made if you have a background or special knowledge that would allow you to make an important contribution to the group.
Special circumstance will be considered (for example, if one has a serious health concern compassion might dictate that one be allowed to join in order to learn more about traditions which might be of help).
Warm Regards
Ryan -
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Tue, September 2, 2008 - 7:07 PMRyan,
Why is the subject matter not suited to a public forum?
Some without a background in Tibetan yoga might be interested in learning. It's not that easy to find information on Tibetan yoga, let alone a class.
I'm glad you would open the group to those in great need, with serious health conditions, for example. . .
would the health condition of samsara qualify one for such compassion as well?
Ezekiel -
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Tue, September 2, 2008 - 9:25 PMUnfortunately I am seriously pushing the limit in allowing what I am.
There are issues of samaya (pledges) that would preclude the majority of people who practice Tibetan yoga from joining into a discussion that was open to public view.
So, if it was an open forum, generally non-practitioners would be the only people free to use it. There are certainly some folks who have been taught TY without samaya, but they are more the exception than the rule.
There seems to be little point in having a list on Tibetan yoga if the majority of people who practice it would be disallowed from participating.
I *did* start a totally public forum on largely the same range of topics. However, it never really took off. Maybe this thread can breathe some life into the public forum
tribes.tribe.net/candali_yoga
Warm Regards,
Ryan -
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Wed, September 3, 2008 - 9:03 AMRyan,
That makes sense.
But wouldn't there still be issues of samaya - even if everyone in the group were initiated practitioners of Tibetan yoga - considering that different practitioners may have been initiated into different traditions or schools, etc.?
Anyway, I'll still check in with the candali yoga tribe. . . and when I have the opportunity, check out some Tibetan yoga in real life.
By the way, I'm still interested in your paper on the 5 Tibetans. How is that coming?
Ezekiel -
-
Re: Interested in Tibetan-yoga? (X-posted)
Wed, September 3, 2008 - 2:34 PMAs to samaya, if your root-guru interprets them in an ultra-conservative way, then yes, a person should avoid such discussion. However, most teachers interpret samaya as allowing discussion of practice with fellow practitioners. Compassion is also often considered sufficient reason to go with the spirit, rather than the letter, of the pledges.
> I'm still interested in your paper on the 5 Tibetans
It has been back burnered for the moment. I was hoping to find a source text among about a dozen texts I have on 'phrul 'khor in the Six Yogas of Naropa. I'm about 3/4 the way through them but haven't found the 5 rites together. I should really just put pen to paper (or finger to key) and write up what I did find.
I can easily deconstruct most of the objections (supposed "historical inaccuracies") I've encountered. This is much easier than it sounds, because whoever wrote that section had a half-baked understanding of Tibetan Buddhism and keeps making mistakes like conflating Hinayana and Vajrayana understandings regarding the body etc.
The bottom line is that none of the supposed objections hold water and most are flat out *wrong*. However, in terms of offering proof that they are definitely Tibetan, the firmest bit of data I have is a statement by slob dpon kun dga’ rnam sgrol that they are the real-deal and belong to a cycle of 'phrul 'khor from the na ro chos drug.
Beyond that, there is of course the fact that they look and feel like Tibetan yoga. They don't really look or feel much like any other type of movement practice I'm familiar with. There are other things that seem like a stretch to imagine as coincidence, practicing twenty-one repetitions, the importance of reversing the descending sexual energy, the connection between throat and genital centers, linking the transformation of sexual energy with the creation of an alchemical elixir etc.
These really do seem far too specific for somebody to just make up, and *get right*, by coincidence.
My enthusiasm for the project has flagged, but I’ll still try to get something finished.
-
-
-
-
-